The Scam “Invitation to Tender With Emirates Group” vendor.registration@theemirategroup.com

On 11th of February 2025 binsec GmbH received an “Invitation to Tender With Emirates Group” from vendor.registration@theemirategroup.com:

Dear Valued Vendor,
Greetings from Emirates Group,
We invite you to register as a vendor with Emirates Group. A leading aviation company in UAE. Our goal is to build a diverse and qualified vendor base to support our business needs. This will open up opportunities to provide goods and services to our projects and developments.
Our projects are open for all companies. And this is a special consideration towards your participation for the ongoing registration
To register, Kindly confirm your interest by requesting for Vendor Questionnaire and EOI.
We look forward to potentially working with you!
Best Regards
Mr. Sameh Bakier
Vendor Coordinator Group Procurement & Contract
Shared Services Center of The Emirates Group

After answering to that e-mail, claiming to be interested, one receive an e-mail with three pdf documents including the Emirates Vendor Assessment Policy for example. Truth told, that documents look good and authentic. The mail also includes a “Vendor Regisgtration Acceptance Form”:

So they request a payment of AED 57.850 (equivalent to 15.000€) to start the vendor process. The domain sending the e-mails is theemirategroup.com, the original domain of The Emirates Group is theemiratesgroup.com. Take a look at the missing “s” in the domain…

free online tls test for a specific custom port, alternate to 443

You are looking for a free online tool, that checks and test the ssl/tls configuration on a specific custom port, alternative to 443? Then checkout the binsec.tool SSLCheck – there you can specify the port that should be tested, like 8443. The SSLScan fo binsec.tool will give you an overview over the protocols and ciphers of the TLS configuration and checks the level of security. It even supports testing StartTLS for SMTP, IMAP and LDAP.

binsec.tools – WebCompScan

WebCompScan from binsec.tools enables you to identify the technologies used on websites and check whether they are outdated or vulnerable.

The technologies that the WebCompScan tool can detect include CMS systems, web servers, programming languages, JavaScript libraries, and also payment methods offered.

To detect the technologies, it uses open source databases with regex patterns. The website to be checked is automatically opend up in a browser and the patterns are used to check whether the various components of the website contain indications of known technologies. In addition to HTTP headers and the HTML source code of the website, the Document Object Model (DOM) and the JavaScript variables are also analyzed.

In some cases, version information on the software components used can also be obtained in this way. In the next step, these are checked against an open source database for known vulnerabilities. It is also checked whether the software components are still supported by the manufacturer or are already end of life.

In principle, all of this information is public, but binsec.tools combines it into one free pentest tool.

Starting: binsec.tools | Online Tools for Penetration Testing

The binsec group launches binsec.tools:

https//binsec.tools | Online Tools for Penetration Testing

  • SSLCheck: The SSLCheck module will show the available SSL/TLS protocols, ciphers and additional certificate information. The scan will run multiple SSL/TLS connections to the target domain.
  • WebCompScan: WebCompScan will browse to the given URL and will try to find used technologies by different methods on the available information like DOM, headers and many more. This scan is not invasive as it will only browse the website once like any other browser. 
  • DNSCheck: The DNSCheck will perform security and validation checks on the given DNS domain. This check is not invasive and will perform standard DNS lookups.

Requirements for penetration tests according to ISO IEC 81001-5-1

The IEC 81001-5-1 defines requirements for the life cycle of the development and maintenance regarding healthcare applications and information technology within medical devices. To achieve this, the standard sets requirements for various processes in the life cycle of a medical device and is primarily divided into the following requirement categories.

  • Quality management
  • Software Development Process
  • Software Maintenance Process
  • Security Risk Management Process
  • Software Configuration Management Process
  • Software problem resolution Process

Within the software development process there is the requirement for software system testing, which is divided into security requirement testing, threat mitigation testing, vulnerability testing and penetration testing.

The manufacturer must commission a penetration test to identify security vulnerabilities in the software (health application or medical device). IEC 81001-5-1 requires that penetration testing attempts to compromise confidentiality, integrity and availability. This may involve bypassing several lines of defense in the design by using tools and, in particular, manual skills of the penetration tester.

The standard also emphasizes that penetration testers must be independent of the development department. Since very few medical device manufacturers have their own penetration testing department, a company specializing in this usually has to be commissioned.

Penetration Test according to MDR (Medical Device Regulation)

In Annex I, for “devices that incorporate electronic programmable systems and software that are devices in themselves”, the MDR requires verification and validation under point 17.2 that the product or software was developed according to the state of the art – from the perspective of the IT security:

For devices that incorporate software or for software that are devices in themselves, the software shall be developed and manufactured in accordance with the state of the art taking into account the principles of development life cycle, risk management, including information security, verification and validation.

REGULATION (EU) 2017/745 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 5 April 2017

In the Medical Device Coordination Group Document “MDCG 2019-16 Guidance on Cybersecurity for medical devices” there is now the requirement of penetration testing as a specification of the previous verification and validation requirement:

MDR Annex I Section 17.2 and IVDR Annex I Section 16.2 require for devices that incorporate software or for software that are devices in themselves, that the software shall be developed and manufactured in accordance with the state of the art taking into account the principles of the development life cycle, risk management, including information security, verification and validation. The primary means of security verification and validation is testing. Methods can include security feature testing, fuzz testing, vulnerability scanning and penetration testing. Additional security testing can be one by using tools for secure code analysis and tools that scan for open source code and libraries used in the product, to identify components with known issues.

Medical Device Coordination Group Document, MDCG 2019-16

Penetration Test Requirements of Microsoft 365 App Compliance Program

Participating in the Microsoft 365 Certification App Compliance Program for Microsoft Teams applications, Sharepoint Apps/Add-ins, Office Add-ins and WebApps requires performing a penetration test. In the Initial Document Submission a company needs to submit supporting documentation and evidence. Besides other topics, a Penetration Testing Report is required. A penetration testing report completed within the last 12 months. This report must include the pentest of the live environment that supports the deployment of the app along with any additional environment that supports the operation of the app. If segmentation controls are in place, these must also be validated.

The pentest requirements by Microsoft are:

  • Every 12 months application and infrastructure pentesting must take place annually.
  • These Tests are conducted by a reputable independent company.
  • Remediation of identified critical and high-risk vulnerabilities must be completed within one month after the pentest report.
  • The full external attack surface (IP Addresses, URLs, API Endpoints, etc.) must be included within the scope of penetration testing and must be documented within the penetration testing report.
  • Web application penetration testing must include all typical vulnerability classes; for example, the most current OWASP Top 10 or SANS Top 25 CWE.
  • Retesting of identified vulnerabilities by the penetration testing company is not required — remediation and self-review is sufficient however, adequate evidence to demonstrate sufficient remediation must be provided during the assessment. Retesting of identified vulnerabilities are nevertheless best practice in information security.
  • Penetration testing reports will be reviewed to ensure there are no vulnerabilities that meet the following automatic failure criteria:
    • Unsupported operating system
    • Default, enumerable, or guessable administrative accounts.
    • SQL injection risks
    • XSS
    • Directory traversal (file path) vulnerabilities.
    • Typical HTTP vulnerabilities, e.g., Header response splitting, Request smuggling, and Desync attacks
    • Source code disclosure (including LFI)
    • Any critical or high score as defined by the CVSS patch management guidelines.
    • Any significant technical vulnerability which can be readily exploited to compromise a large amount of EUII or OUI

Better Pentesting – No Bullshit

Actually it should have been called BETTER PENTESTING – NO BULLSHIT, considering the advertising and sales promises of many pentesting providers. Somewhat less brutal it became BETTER PENTESTING – NO NONSENSE as the new advertising slogan for pentesting of binsec GmbH.

How to come up with all the bullshit – sorry nonsense – of many other pentesting service providers? Here is a little Best of Nonsense:
  • Advertisement: “We find all vulnerabilities!”
  • Statement: “We perform penetration tests with Nessus.”
  • A pentest is sold and as a report the customer receives an Excel file with about 10 lines of content.
  • Certifications of our pentester: CISSP, CEH…”
  • You don’t have staff for it, but you put the service Penetration Testing on the website. Typical IT system house or data privacy company.
  • Penetration testing depth: vulnerability scan
  • One does not get high in Google ranking and buys pentest backlinks at zdnet ( ~1.000€) or has “Pentest Frankfurt” advertised as a service in forums.
  • Company buy Google Ads with the keyword “blackhole pentest”.
  • One sells the days simply double or triple. In this way, employees can also achieve 250% target fulfillment for their own bonus.